The Individual Education Plan or IEP part 1: The basics Monday, Nov 2 2009 


Okay, let’s start with the basic elements of the Individual Education Plan or IEP. I’ll go over who needs one, why they need one, the legalities involved and some alternatives that are allowable by law but maybe not the best for your kid.

An IEP is a plan for your child’s education that will allow you and the school to make accomodations for your child’s special needs. The official legal definition is somewhat longer, but that is sufficient for what we are doing here. IEPs are governed by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, or IDEA 2004. 2004 is the most recent update to the act. You can search the act in full at the Wrightslaw law center. Also, if you are looking for a good legal guide of your rights and responsibilities, wrightslaw is the best advocacy resource out there for parents.

A quick note here: If your child is in a child find/early intervention program you will not have an IEP. You will have an IFSP, or Individual Family Services Plan. When you transition to your local school that will change to an IEP.

IEPs are put together by a team, which typically consists of the parents, the child’s teacher, a school system representative, the principal of the school, the child’s case manager and any specialists that may be involved in the child’s care. For example, our IEP meetings also have an autism specialist who works for the county, an occupational therapist and a speech therapist. Those services are critical to our sons education and as such we need their input when we plan his IEP.

IEP terms last a year, and by law must be renewed prior to then.The reason this is important is that the IEP is actually a contract, enforceable and actionable by law. As such, many schools are loathe to volunteer services because they know they have to provide them. This is where we as parents need to be experts. It helps if you can speak with other parents, do some research on the internet and consult with any specialists you see prior to attending an IEP meeting.

However, if you draft an IEP and are unhappy with it, as a member of the team you have the right to call another IEP meeting at any time. At the end of every meeting everyone on the team must sign off on the IEP. Again, if you are unhappy, you do not have to sign. You can also write “signed under protest” above your signature in order to show that you are not satisfied with the school’s solutions or supports for your child.

The key thing to take away from this article is that you are the expert on your child. Administrators and teachers always present themselves as experts on children, but nobody knows more about a child than his parents. Remember that and you will do just fine.

Next up: What will the school offer me?

Early Intervention, or the first time we heard “autism” Friday, Nov 21 2008 


I’m going to jump ahead a little to when we first decided to contact our local early intervention services.  The reason for that will become apparent, I promise.

So at 2, Raymond’s aunt commented on his lack of language.  She works for early intervention up in Maryland, so we naturally took her seriously.  I was definitely noticing the lack of language, but still in a great deal of denial that there could be a problem.  I was still of that folksy mindset that “some kids talk later than others.”  Still, after some heated discussions, I finally agreed to put in a request for the PE-ID program, which stands for Parent Education – Infant Development.  It is handled by our local community services board.  It is a federally backed program, but PE-ID is the name in Virginia. The name varies from state to state.

So the intake woman came out, and we began doing the paperwork.  She filled out what I now know to be a sensory profile and asked a number of questions about birth and development.  We were at a point where we felt like we were almost done, and my wife asked “What do you think?”  The intake officer looked us both in the eye and said “I think you should be prepared to accept that your son has autism.”

I think I literally saw red.  Let me explain my perspective for a moment.  Prior to accepting these issues, I felt it was my job as a father to protect my son.  This woman, who had seen my son for less than 2 hours, was telling me something that his pediatrician hadn’t mentioned to us.  I was furious, mainly because I felt my son had not had the opportunity to “defend” himself by showing his skills in a full evaluation.  Convoluted, I know, but denial makes logic flow through the most unlikely crevices.

My wife immediately burst into tears.  I said something like “I don’t think you are qualified to make that statement.”  I am fairly certain I kept my temper controlled enough not to curse, but I wouldn’t swear to it.  Naturally, the remainder of the interview was somewhat uncomfortable, as I was angry and my wife was in tears.  The intake officer left, and Kelly and I fought like there was no tomorrow.  What exactly we were fighting about is fuzzy now.  I think we were both so emotional it was the only way we could express what we felt, but I was still angry when I woke up the next morning.  Naturally, I called the agency to complain.  Her supervisor apologized for her statement, agreed with me, and basically said whatever she thought I needed to hear to shut me up.

So, thanks to my complaining we ended up with the director of Speech Therapy for PE-ID.  She was wonderful.  The evaluation went as well as it could, and naturally it discovered a significant delay in both receptive and expressive language.  We qualified for services, and we started weekly speech therapy visits. Interestingly enough, now that I think back, there was no indicated need for occupational therapy. I can only attribute that to Raymond’s refusal to cooperate in the eval, the beginning of a trend that we still see today.  I can’t really blame him.  Evaluations suck, doctors offices suck, and being asked to do the same things over and over for different people must suck more than anything!

She is a wonderful therapist.  She showed us how to engage Raymond, and that he could concentrate if he was interested.  That was the first real glimmer of hope. As we went through the process, I watched his language grow.  Incremental growth, but at least he was moving forward.  She was well spoken enough to break the news to us gently, and really helped us begin to navigate the autism road.   She was politic enough never to mention autism, assuming we would research on our own.  She was right.  Both my wife and I were researching autism seperately, not mentioning it to each other because we had already had several fights about it.

PE-ID took us up to Early Childhood Intervention Services with our county school system.  I want to give a few details about the program, just in case anyone is looking for something like it in their area.  First off, our local RACSB has a great questionnaire to see if you qualify.  That can be found here at the RACSB web site. A list of lead agencies for early intervention programs by state is here.  There is more info out there, just google it and you will find tons of stuff.  The program is actually created by IDEA, so the fact that both candidates were willing to fully fund IDEA is a really big deal for everyone in the disability community.   As long as the president elect fulfills his promise, he will have my support.

Finally, I attended a training class last night for our local Special Education Advisory Committee.  My wife and I plan on joining to help advise on areas that are underserved, and to make our voices heard.  Who should be there but the intake officer who first came out to our house.  I sat through the class, half there and half reflecting on how I behaved. I have thought on numerous occasions that without her, we might have been years in dealing with denial and refusing to see the light.  I have also often felt guilty for what I did, knowing as I do now that she was trying to help our son.  So, being a man of conviction and humility, after the class was over I went over, introduced myself again and apologized.  She seemed genuinely touched by it, and I also thanked her for having the courage to tell us her real opinion.  I told her an abbreviated version of what we went through, and she seemed genuinely happy to hear about it.  I even offered to write a letter to her boss!  She said that wasn’t necessary, but thanked me anyway.  We chitchatted for a few minutes and then went our seperate ways.  It felt good, as doing the right thing often does.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: